I TOOK A SURVEY AND WOULD BELIEVE HALF of THE MEN ARE CIRCUMSIZED????

IT'S TRUE, HALF OF AMERICAN FOLKS ARE JEWISH!!! I COULDN'T BELIEVE IT. I DID THIS AT MY JOB IN A FACTORY OF OVER 1200 EMPLOYEES. WHO WOULD DO THIS TO A CHILD?? I'M NOT CUT AND THANK YOU GOD IN HEAVEN. I'VE HEARD BECAUSE IT CUTS DOWN ON DISEASE, THAT'S A CROCK, IF YOUR FATHER SHOWS YOU HOW TO CLEAN PROPERLY AS A CHILD...... ALSO MEN ARE MORE SENSITIVE WITH IT NOT BEING CUT, AND DON'T HAVE TO USE CREAMS AND JELLS.... I THINK IT'S SEXIER TOO...... WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THIS EXTRA SKIN??????????????????????

I TOOK A SURVEY AND WOULD BELIEVE HALF of THE MEN ARE CIRCUMSIZED????
Wow, on the one hand you are kind of right, on the other hand, you are wrong.





If you are in the U.S., all of those men who are circumcised are not done because they are Jewish. It is because it is the custom of people here in the U.S. to mulilate their little infant boys. It started a long time ago in Victorian times in England and the U.S. Once they realized that it was not necessary and did not cause the diseases they thought it would, England dropped the practice like a hot potato, but the U.S. continues. A circumcised penis is rare in European countries. As a matter of fact, the main people in the world who circumcise their boys are the Jewish, the Muslim, (for religious reasons) and the U.S. Only 20% of the world's men are circumcised, and 18% of those men are from the U.S.





Why? Because here in the U.S., they use infant foreskins for burn treatment, and beauty products. Routine "medical" circumcision makes the doctors a lot of $$$$, because they charge to do it, then they sell the foreskins. And since it's been done so long, a lot of doctors don't know the proper care of an intact baby boy, (i.e., LEAVING IT ALONE!) and advise parents to clean and scrub under it, which causes it to get infected (I mean, just the same way it would hurt a girls privates to do this, it hurst a boys) which may lead to a then "necessary" circumcision a little later down the road.





But I agree with you. My husband is going through foreskin restoration now. The amount of sensitivity he has gained from keeping the glans covered has caused him to have more feeling in it now, and it is amazing...orgasms are entirely different now.





Thank goodness I educated myself when I was pregnant, and my baby boy has every last bit of the the genitilia that he was born with.


*******


Wolf, Wolf, Wolf...(shakes head) typical American female. Have you taken a mirror to your own genitals lately? What you see down there is far more "gross" than any intact penis. It's genitals. They are not supposed to be ugly or pretty. They are supposed to be functional.





Tell me, if you were to get a vaginal infection, or a yeast infection, or any other "good ole" bacterial infection, what part of your genitals would amputate to get rid of it? The facts are females get just as many or more infections that they have to get treated than an intact man does. 80% of the world's population of men are intact. None of them are complaining.





As for the claim of less sexually transmitted disease. Why don't you go and talk to one of the millions of CIRCUMCISED MEN who have the same diseases, and who have AIDS? Circumcision does not prevent these things. PROTECTION, CONDOMS are what prevents them.





Oh, and Peachyone, your lack of intelligence is astounding. Have you ever spoken to a man who has had both intact and later circumcised sex? If you spoke with a man who was circumcised as an infant, he never knew what he had in the first place to know what he was missing. The frenelum, on the underside of the foreskin, has the same amount of nerve equivalence as the female's clitoris. For some intact men, they can be stimulated to orgasm from stimulation of the frenulum alone, the same way as a female is able to be stimulated to orgasm via the clitoris. During circumcision, most or more typically, all of the frenulum is lost.





Just the same way as a circumcised woman can still have children and be stimulated to orgasm via the g-spot with no clitoris, the same it is for circumcised men. They can still bear children, and have orgasms, but the orgasms are in no way the same as they would have been if their genitilia had been left as nature (or God if you'd rather) intended for them to be.





I challenge any one of you to scroll down to the bottom of this screen, click UK and ask any one over seas what they think of circumcised men. The response you get may surprise you. Preference for circumcised men only exist here in the U.S. and in other Jewish and Muslim cultures. The same reasions for and stigmatisms that surround male circumcision here, are associated with reasons in other lands where female circumcisions exist. (It's cleaner, ew, uncut genitals are gross, sex will be better, etc.) They are exactly the same over there where female circumcision continues as they are over here.





Every part of the genitals are there for a purpose, and should be left alone, and not amputated.
Reply:Dear Answerer,


Your lack of TACT is astounding. If I have not fully understood (in your view) the anatomy of a foreskin function, it does not indicate lack of intelligence, but rather an ignorance of that "fact". Report Abuse

Reply:Actually, peachyone, it shows that you shouldn't have answered the question without the correct amount of information. Since you answered it anyways, that makes you an idiot. You are an idiot, ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Report Abuse

Reply:It does not cut down on disease unless you are sexually active and negate the responsibility of using a condom. Women get far more infections than men do..we don't go around chopping Labia off. Some of these answers here are ridiculous. Sorry.


Sex feels better with an uncircumsized man.





That's all I'm saying about this.
Reply:More than Jewish men are circumsized. In fact, I'd say about 70% of the penis I have seen are circumsized here in the US - and only about 15% of those men were Jewish.
Reply:get over yourself.
Reply:The crock is that half of American folks are Jewish. They aren't the only ones who circumcise. I am female and prefer cut to uncut. I have never thought that the "dangle" is in any way "sexy".Yes, the uncut men I have known are more "sensitive" which has meant they don't last as long. Not a plus where women are concerned. And just to enlighten you, "female circumcision" involves cutting out the entire clitoris which would be like you losing your entire penis. Not an equal proposition at all.
Reply:thats disgusting


doctors think they know more than God but they dont!!!!!!!
Reply:It's common practice in America to circumsize babies. I don't agree with it but not everyone who's circumsized is a jew. Since the jews run the media they want their sick tradition to be brought upon Whites so they can blend in.
Reply:I really couldn't care less about another man's foreskin. I'm cut and glad to be so, but I have witnessed my nephew getting his circumcision and......I was disgusted
Reply:whilst the point on sensitivity and protection against disease ( provided they clean properly) are certainly correct, not all circumscised men are jewish, far from it.





personally i like the extra skin, and my partner does too, he unfortunatley was forced when little to have the operation due to parent's who seem to think they know everything that's best for their child, but variety is the spice of life as they say.





also note, PLEASE DONT POST IN ALL CAPS, AS ITS CONSIDERED SHOUTING AND COUNTS AS DISRUPTIVE POSTING.
Reply:most men get cut, not just jews.





and it does decrease std/hiv risk not to mention regular 'ole bacterial infections. even with cleaning why risk it?


plently of men still enjoy sex while cut and its easier to get a condom on.


I think its gross to be uncut
Reply:Jews work in factories?
Reply:all i know is that I'm uncut my wife loves it and gets more friction and orgasms that way so yeah i like having my whole penis and not a captain without its hat