An internal survey?

".....An internal survey revealed that some employees at Company Y had called in sick in order to take care of a sick child. The company's CEO instituted free on-site day care in hopes of reducing the number of employees engaging in this practice. However, the number of employees who called in sick to care for a sick child was actually higher in the sixth month of the on-site day-care program than it had been the month before the program was instituted....."








do you understand the meaning of this sentence ?





i see people phoned-in to the office because they are sick while the real cause was their baby were sick.





Then what CEO did ? this is not understandable and why it failed ?





what is on-site day care ?








can anybody explain the meaning in a simpler way in steps ?

An internal survey?
It's... not that hard.. people phoned in sick for their kids because they had sick kids AND... they DIDN'T WANT TO GO TO WORK... and sick kids are a great excuse.. (Their kids are ALWAYS sick... they're KIDS) Once this day care idea came to light, they notice that the CEO was a complete MORON and figured they could take MORE days off, for them AND for their children.





This is a business question.. for a big business... say 50 employees at least.





You find that a lot of your employees are calling in sick for the same reason... the reason is "my kid's sick".





So you become a total moron and forget that when YOUR kids are sick, THEY stay home and YOU go to work. (Unless the kids are VERY young) like any NORMAL human being.





So you say "You CAN'T call in sick anymore because I've instituted this "Daycare AT work", which makes no sense because the kids aren't going to leave home for school so why the f would they leave home to go to your work?





Then your employees notice that you're trying to force them into coming into work more and NOBODY likes being forced to do ANYTHING, so f that, I'm taking more days off... after all the CEO's so stupid he thinks that daycare replaces school when it comes to sickness.
Reply:Firstly it sounds like the management is dumb.




















On site day care is baby sitting facilities at the work site.





I don't think neither parents nor onsite care-givers want a sick child there (at work)to spread an infection among their other charges, disrupt play activities, or create other related problems, so it stands to reason that a parent will prefer to stay at home to care for a sick child.





The increase in absenteeism may be just a statistical quirk or it could very well be "backlash" against the management's attempt to reduce absence.





A little bit of age discrimination might be useful to counteract such a dilemna (at the risk of violating equal-opportunity requirements) hiring only older employees who are less likely to have young children might off set this phenomenon, but if they are too old then they will have health problems of their own, inspite of the wizzened hands they might lend to the operation as well.





Hiring on the basis of health-related job absence might be illegal under fair employment practices rules.





Age discrimination is... but "Experience Qualifications"... might get you around this if you are willing to pay higher wages in compensation for the added years of experience you thus bring to bear in your work force.
Reply:the people were lying like syphlitic ridden crack whores about their kids being sick..

Teeth %26 Gums help